<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>How to shoot? &#187; admin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.howtoshot.com/author/admin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.howtoshot.com</link>
	<description>Some answers to my everyday photo trouble question...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 21:24:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon V1: bad news for Panasonic G1/G2 and Sony NEX</title>
		<link>http://www.howtoshot.com/2090/nikon-v1-bad-news-for-panasonic-g1g2-and-sony-nex/</link>
		<comments>http://www.howtoshot.com/2090/nikon-v1-bad-news-for-panasonic-g1g2-and-sony-nex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 21:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Camera arena]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtoshot.com/?p=2090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nikon J1 vs Panasonic G2 vs Sony NEX-5 vs Olympus PEN E-PL Reading emails today and seeing wonderful news! Nikon finally has announced the small sensor nonDSLR mirrorless camera with interchangeable lenses that opens the door to creativity anywhere. Built around new small body, 10Mpx C-MOS sensor, new lens mount. Ladies and gentlemans fastest mirrorless [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Nikon J1 vs Panasonic G2 vs Sony NEX-5 vs Olympus PEN E-PL</h1>
<p ALIGN="justify">
<img src="" alt="" title="nikon_V1" width="218" height="211" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-120" align="left"/>
Reading emails today and seeing wonderful news! Nikon finally has announced the small sensor nonDSLR mirrorless camera with interchangeable lenses that opens the door to creativity anywhere. Built around new small body, 10Mpx C-MOS sensor, new lens mount. Ladies and gentlemans fastest mirrorless cameras Nikon 1 line are here. 
</p>
<br /><span id="more-2090"></span>
<p><br CLEAR="all" /></p>
<p>
There are two cameras from Nikon 1 line, V1 and J1. The V1 is high-end model in the lineup and features magnesium alloy body and electronic viewfinder. It also has a special port allowing the connection of new special speedlight or GPS unit (later probably other accesories). The Nikon V1 kit with 10-30mm (27-81mm 35mm eq.) lens will be $899.95, the Nikon J1 camera with 10-30mm lens kit will be available at a suggested retail price of $649.95. Nikon also announced an adapter allowing the use of Nikon F-mount lenses. The question is if AF will be available through adapter or not.<br /><br />
Official PR says: From Nikon, a company with more than 75 years in imaging excellence, the Nikon 1 J1 is an advanced camera with interchangeable lenses that opens the door to a fresh way to capture pictures and High Definition (HD) movies. This Nikon 1 system represents a new category of camera that challenges conventional thinking, emphasizing a pocketable form factor with unbelievable speed, combined with the high image quality that only Nikon could create. Thanks to a wealth of innovative technologies, the Nikon J1 camera is a simple to use conduit for creativity, seemingly anticipating a consumer's needs in any situation. Moments are instantly captured using amazingly fast new hybrid Autofocus (AF), and blazing fast speed with continuous AF. Users can also shoot with confidence knowing that the Smart Photo Selector will automatically capture the best possible image without a second thought. Furthermore, just a touch of the shutter button instantly captures a high quality image while simultaneously recording Full HD 1080p movies, and the exciting new Motion Snapshot mode captures fleeting moments like never before with a combination of moving and still images, bringing memories to life. To accompany this exciting new form factor, Nikon created the entirely new 1 NIKKOR lens system that seamlessly integrates powerful precision optics into a camera platform to capture more of the world around the user.
<br /><br />
"The needs of the consumer are changing and the world is becoming one of visual conversation, which paves the way for the next chapter in image capture devices. The new Nikon 1 system is the culmination of more than 75 years of optical excellence and relentless pursuit to the unrivaled technological advancements in camera technology," said Bo Kajiwara, Director of Marketing, Nikon Inc. "Nikon's new 1 J1 camera allows consumers to have confidence in a new way to express themselves, with amazing speed, versatility, ease of use and portability."
</P>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.howtoshot.com/2090/nikon-v1-bad-news-for-panasonic-g1g2-and-sony-nex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New camera comming soon: Nikon D5 and Nikon D800</title>
		<link>http://www.howtoshot.com/118/nikon-camera-nikon-d5-nikon-d800/</link>
		<comments>http://www.howtoshot.com/118/nikon-camera-nikon-d5-nikon-d800/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 14:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Camera arena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D3s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D700s]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtoshot.com/?p=118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whats next? Nikon D800 or D700s I have been reading several discussion about what is the future Nikon product. Are we going to see an upgrade like Nikon D700s or fully working new model which could be called Nikon D800? I am going to make my personal bet not only for cheapest full frame dslr [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Whats next? Nikon D800 or D700s</h1>
<p ALIGN="justify">
<img src="http://www.howtoshot.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/nikon_d800.jpg" alt="" title="nikon_d800" width="218" height="211" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-120" align="left"/>
I have been reading several discussion about what is the future Nikon product. Are we going to see an upgrade like Nikon D700s or fully working new model which could be called Nikon D800? I am going to make my personal bet not only for cheapest full frame dslr however also for top model which for sure will be Nikon D5 and not D4.  
</p>
<br /><span id="more-118"></span>
<p><br CLEAR="all" /></p>
<!-- AD -->
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-7035637283530791";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 90;
google_ad_format = "728x90_as";
google_ad_type = "text";
google_ad_channel = "";
google_color_border = "000000";
google_color_bg = "000000";
google_color_link = "FFFF00";
google_color_text = "FFFFFF";
google_color_url = "FFFF00";
google_ui_features = "rc:0";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
<br /><br />

<h2>D700s vs D800</h2>
<p>
General live cycle of the Nikon cameras are slightly more than two years. So when we see current portfolio we should expect new model in full frame range, mean exchange for Nikon D700. When we see its parallel Nikon D90, it has been already exchange for D7000. Now we have two options how Nikon make it successor. 
<ol>
	<li>Updated product, thats D700s</li>
	<li>New product, D800</li>
</ol><br />
Since fullframe sector is the one which is very interesting and new for Nikon. I am expecting new camera, mean Nikon D800 more than just an "s" version. We can not see successor of D300s here, because from marketing point of view this camera will be probably introduced after new flag model to be called as kind of derivate thing and "same technology for less price" label. D3X is on the top and there is not many reason to drop it down. D5 which is also the sport reporter camera has to be introduced when new engine will be ready. Why new engine? Because basic D5 camera has to be able to make at least 10fps. Nowdays limitation for D3x is the engine, not shutter release which limits high Mpx full frame camera to slow Fps. Remember what it can do in Dx mode. D700 comes a year after D3, so we can expect D800 a year after D3x. Since D700 keep specification of D3, D800 can keep specs with D3x or D5.</p>
<h2>And why D5 and not D4?</h2>
<p>
And why not D4? Asian are very much into the number and its meaning. Almost none of the asian manufacturer use number 4 as a primary digit. Simply because it is bad luck number such as 13. 40 and 400 is ok. Just 4 is not. Remember that there is no Fuji S4, Lumix LX4, Tungsten T4 etc..
</p>

<h2>Specification of D700 successor</h2>
<p>
More less the same things we see now on D3x. The only question is the price and if Nikon keep D700 in production. 
AF: 51 points. CAM3500FX same as D3X with  

Shutter: 1/8,000 ~ 60 sec, B

Flash Sync: 1/250, no more

Built-in Flash: GN 12, same as D700.

Sensor type: 24Mpx CMOS, same as D3x

Sensor resolution: 24Mpx in FX and 10Mpx in DX.

Frame Rate in machine gun mode: 3 fps. 8 fps in DX mode. 

ISO range: hopefully 50 - 6,400 with boost up to 25 000 and no noise. :)

Build in wifi or GPS could be a nice add on. Possibility of electronic viewfinder for live mode as well. 
</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.howtoshot.com/118/nikon-camera-nikon-d5-nikon-d800/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>(R)Evolution? Panasonic Lumix LX5 vs LX3</title>
		<link>http://www.howtoshot.com/51/revolution-panasonic-lumix-lx5-vs-lx3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.howtoshot.com/51/revolution-panasonic-lumix-lx5-vs-lx3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 13:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Camera arena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leica D-Lux 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leica D-Lux 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic LX3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic LX5]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtoshot.com/?p=51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or can we say Leica D-Lux 5 vs D-Lux 4? :) I am probably not the only one who said when first hear about Panasonic Lumix LX4 "Thats it!" LX4 was probably first compact camera with all manual feature any even DSLR user can imagine. What is more finally with real wide angle fast lens. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Or can we say Leica D-Lux 5 vs D-Lux 4? :)</h1> 
<p ALIGN="justify"> 
<a href="http://www.howtoshot.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/panasonic-lx5.jpg"><img src="http://www.howtoshot.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/panasonic-lx5-300x225.jpg" alt="" title="panasonic-lx5" width="300" height="225" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-53" /></a>
I am probably not the only one who said when first hear about Panasonic Lumix LX4 "Thats it!" LX4 was probably first compact camera with all manual feature any even DSLR user can imagine. What is more finally with real wide angle fast lens. Lumix LX3 so become another camera along with my Nikon Dslr. Now we have an upgrade: Panasonic LX5... reason enough to upgrade or not? How about LX6 rumours? :)
UPDATE: Fuji X100 i is here... new man in the town?</p>
<br /><span id="more-51"></span>
<p><br CLEAR="all" /></p>
<br />
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-7035637283530791";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 90;
google_ad_format = "728x90_as";
google_ad_type = "text_image";
google_ad_channel = "";
google_color_border = "000000";
google_color_bg = "000000";
google_color_link = "FFFF00";
google_color_text = "FFFFFF";
google_color_url = "FFFF00";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
<br /><br />

<h2>Panasonic LX5 (or LX3): first compat camera for DSLR users</h2>
<p>Remember the times when I almost crash my compact camera because of impotency to make pictures i want. No manual, no manual focus, no bracketing, no histogram. I always miss all potential what I have with my Nikon DSLR. I saw LX3... I bought one. And from that time, my Nikon has much more free time... Belive or not but most of the time i shot at full auto called iA. Really, unbelievable. The auto mode is so good here that I do not use all features I cried for that much as I expected. Of course the picture quality is something different... it is still just compact camera. However I do not want to write review of this camera, you can find much better articles. This is about latest comparison... the new one vs old one. Until Lumix LX6 arrive. :)
</p>


<h2><br />What I hate on my LX3</h2>
<p>Well... not too many things. Just two: 
<ul>
	<li>Lens distortion at wide angle - you need to be careful not to have people in the corner. They do not look good. And they will hate you! :)</li>
	<li>Zoom - 2.5x zoom is not enough when you start at 24mm. Sometimes I have been cheating with digital zoom, sometimes i just cried.</li>
</ul>
</p>
<a href="http://www.howtoshot.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Panasonic_LX3_LX5.png"><img src="http://www.howtoshot.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Panasonic_LX3_LX5.png" alt="" title="Panasonic_LX3_LX5" width="609" height="246" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-58" /></a>
<p><br CLEAR="all" /></p>
<center>Both camera side by side... looks pretty much the same:)</center><br />
<p>
So lets see, what are the main difference between these two great cameras...
<ul>
	<li>Longer zoom, 30mm more... great!</li>
	<li>Better dynamic range</li>
	<li>Better video rec options</li>
	<li>Some new control buttons (jog dial vs joystick), battery life etc.</li>
<br />
</ul>
<a href="http://www.howtoshot.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Leica_D-Lux_4_D-Lux_5.png"><img src="http://www.howtoshot.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Leica_D-Lux_4_D-Lux_5.png" alt="" title="Leica_D-Lux_4_D-Lux_5" width="609" height="239" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-62" /></a>
<p><br CLEAR="all" /></p>
<center>And Leica version of the camera... i really like the design</center><br />

Well, not much differences here. What do you think? ... just the only things I really want. Lets see everything in table to make it clear and visible how similar these cameras are. In fact, it looks just like a facelift if i can use this car-magazine term. 
<p/>
<br /><br />
<table border="1" cellspacing="2" cellpadding="2" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th width="16%" scope="col"></th>
<th width="42%" scope="col">Panasonic LX5 / Leica D-Lux 5</th>
<th width="42%" scope="col">Panasonic LX3 / Leica D-Lux 4</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Sensor</th>
<td>10 MP / 1.63&#8243; CCD</td>
<td>10 MP / 1.63&#8243; CCD</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Lens</th>
<td>Leica Vario-summicron 24-90 mm F/2-3.3</td>
<td>Leica Vario-summicron 24-60 mm F/2-2.8 </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">LCD</th>
<td>3 inch 460k px</td>
<td>3 inch 460k px </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Dimension/weight</th>
<td>109.7 x 65.5 x 43.0 mm /  271g </td>
<td>108.7 x 59.5 x 27.1 mm /  265 g</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Battery</th>
<td>battery life 400 shots</td>
<td>battery life 380 shots</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">ISO</th>
<td>up to 3200, expansion up to crazy 12800, usable up to 400</td>
<td>up to 3200, usable up to 400</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Movie mode</th>
<td>HD 1,280 x 720 px, 30fps, AVCHD Lite</td>
<td>HD 1,280 x 720 px, 30fps</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Continuous shooting</th>
<td>2.5 fps (can be more in lower res.)</td>
<td>2.5 fps (can be more in lower res.)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Other improvements etc.</th>
<td>improved(?) hand-grip, jog-dial, 1:1 ratio switch, movie recording button</td>
<td>strange joystick</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br /><br />

<h2>UPDATE: Leica D-LUX 5 vs Panasonic LX5</h2>
<p>Ultimate battle: Panasonic vs Leica. What are the difference... not much. The basic camera hardware and lens are the same. The main difference is in final design and whole bundle. So what are the main diferences between LX5 vs D-LUX5?
<ul>
	<li>Better software: Leica has Adobe Lightroom worth $200</li>
	<li>Better warranty: not real difference in EU, however in US it is a great value. Leica has 3 years limited warranty.</li>
	<li>Different design: some people like it some not. Panasonic has small hand grip on right side of the camera for better handling. Leica users do not like it... and their version is much simpler when we talk about design. I like Leica D-LUX 5 design more.</li>
	<li>Different menu layout. I can judge this.</li>
	<li>Different setting: It said that Leica has different setting of the final JPEG processing.</li>
	<li>Leica keep value: when you sell your camera after 5 years on ebay... you probably not get anything... until you sell Leica D-Lux. Leica is really strong brand... even very old camera such as Leica Digilux 1 is still keeping even $400 value.</li>
</ul>
 The only problem of Leica version is that is at least 1,5 times more expensive. In some EU countries even more (close to double). And for the price you get the very same camera.
</p>

<h2><br />UPDATE: Fuji X100 vs Panasonic LX5... or Fuji X100 vs D-LUX 5 Leica</h2>
<p>
This is the question nowdays and probably it is a topic of my next article. Fuji X100 with its APS-C sensor looks like a dream machine. There is no question about image quality and high iso performance. Panasonic LX5 is probably more versatile due to its zoom optics however AF performance could be weaker compare to X100. No personal expirience here so far. 
</p>

<h2><br />Leica D-LUX 4 vs Panasonic LX3... or Leica D-LUX 4 vs D-LUX 5</h2>
<p>
Well... it is the same: D-LUX 4 and LX3 is the exactly same situation as D-LUX 5 and LX5. Read section above. When we compare D-LUXes... we get also the same like with Lumix. So D-LUX 4 vs D-LUX 5 is the same as LX5 vs LX3.
</p>


<h2><br />What about Panasonic LX4</h2>
<p>
I have been asked several times about Lumix LX4. Probably not every knows... asian people are very much into numbers and its meanings. 8 mean luck/fortune in money terms. 98 mean "forever rich", 28 "easy to get rich"... 668 "all the way to get rich" ... 58 "not getting rich" ... and our number 4? 4 means "dead" ... 48 "dead rich" etc. Thats why you do not see even Palm T4, Nikon D4 etc... it is similar as EU/US number 13. 
</p>


<h2><br />Final verdict: enough to buy one?</h2>
<p>No. Clear answer. Even I really miss that 30mm+ of the new LX5. Everything else remain the same. What I really appreciate from Panasonic was the fact that they really care about LX line. They made several firmware updates and add many features during product life of LX3. They probably do the same just for LX5 which is a pitty. However I stay with LX3, waiting for Panasonic Lumix LX6. Some one maybe asking what is the difference between Leica and Panasonic bundle. Well, first of all price, then better software include (Leica include Adobe Elements), nice box, red dot logo and cool image. :) Not worth of money when its arrive on the market. Later on great deal. As always with Leica compat cameras. :) 
<br /><br />
One more thing I am really looking forward to is to see lumix lx5 firmware update. Updates of my LX3 brings a lot of new features... it will be interesting to see whats new come soon and how it will look in 2012 when we see Lumix LX5 vs LX6 comparsion. Or maybe whole LX series disapear by new fight: <a href="http://www.howtoshot.com/188/initial-impression-fuji-x100-–-not-quite-the-review-yet/">Fuji X100 vs LX5</a>. Just look at <a href="http://dpreview.com/reviews/fujifilmx100/">Fuji X100 review</a> and you know what I am talking about. 

</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.howtoshot.com/51/revolution-panasonic-lumix-lx5-vs-lx3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to photograph a newborn?</title>
		<link>http://www.howtoshot.com/363/how-to-photograph-a-newborn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.howtoshot.com/363/how-to-photograph-a-newborn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 19:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtoshot.com/?p=363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Help needed... How to shot Newborn or babies in general? Well... our family is +1 and even I trying to shot almost everything... i found not very easy to photograph my little princess Sarah. She sleep almost whole day, not following my commands... when I want to make her naked she start to piss... Here [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Help needed... How to shot Newborn or babies in general?</h2>
Well... our family is +1 and even I trying to shot almost everything... i found not very easy to photograph my little princess Sarah. She sleep almost whole day, not following my commands... when I want to make her naked she start to piss... 

Here are some links I found so far regarding this topi:
<ul>
	<li><a href="http://www.opensourcephoto.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=19454">http://www.opensourcephoto.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=19454</a></li>
	<li><a href="http://www.digital-photography-school.com/3-quick-newborn-photography-tips">http://www.digital-photography-school.com/3-quick-newborn-photography-tips</a></li>
	<li><a href="http://www.digital-photography-school.com/photographing-babies">http://www.digital-photography-school.com/photographing-babies</a></li>
	<li><a href="http://www.shootbaby.com.au/">http://www.shootbaby.com.au/</a></li>
	<li><a href="http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/photography-beginners-forum-photo-gallery/235159-first-newborn-shoot-c-c-please.html">http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/photography-beginners-forum-photo-gallery/235159-first-newborn-shoot-c-c-please.html</a></li>
</ul>


]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.howtoshot.com/363/how-to-photograph-a-newborn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Posing guides &#8211; How to poses for female model</title>
		<link>http://www.howtoshot.com/135/posing-guides-how-to-poses-for-female-model/</link>
		<comments>http://www.howtoshot.com/135/posing-guides-how-to-poses-for-female-model/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 21:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[model posing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poses guide]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtoshot.com/?p=135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Posing rules for model or photographer? Everyone who shoot especially unexperience models probably find difficulties how to explain and get good poses. Sometimes it is even worse like lack of ideas of the photographer. It is also common situation when someone wanted to start doing portraits or scenic photos. I have tried to find some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Posing rules for model or photographer?</h1>
<p ALIGN="justify"> 
<img src="http://www.howtoshot.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/posenew-small.jpg" alt="" title="female poses" width="218" height="200" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-136" align="left" />
Everyone who shoot especially unexperience models probably find difficulties how to explain and get good poses. Sometimes it is even worse like lack of ideas of the photographer. It is also common situation when someone wanted to start doing portraits or scenic photos. I have tried to find some good resources on the net and this post is just about my results: model posing guides to download and print etc.</p>
<br /><br /><span id="more-135"></span>

<p><br CLEAR="all" /></p>
<h2>Posing tips and tricks for photographers</h2>
<p>
They are several good sites with posing tips for photographers of any level. Usually it is set of rules which is good to follow or at least perfect tips how to be aware of common mistakes. Unfortunately most of the good sites nowdays are paid or just a promo to book with this topic. Here is one <strong><a href="http://www.freedigitalphotographytutorials.com/advanced-tutorials/35-photography-poses-tips-tricks-guidelines-part-1/">free link with poses tricks</a></strong> I found very useful, free and with examples. Second part can be found <strong><a href="http://www.freedigitalphotographytutorials.com/advanced-tutorials/35-photography-poses-tips-tricks-guidelines-part-1/">here</a></strong>. Some other tips can be also find at <strong><a href="http://photographycourse.net/12-basic-posing-tips">photographycourse.net</a></strong> even not that detailed. <strong><a href="http://www.jurgita.com/articles-id104.html">Last article</a></strong> is more less for models to read. There are much more very similar, sometimes is just a copy of previous articles. I personaly like the freedigitalphotographytutorials.com one even I do not agree with everything written there. Last thing is small text from <strong><a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20070321221419/www.eddiej-photography.co.uk/posing-the-female.htm">closed site</a></strong> nowdays however worth to read.<br /><br />
</p>

<h2>Posing tips and tricks for photographers</h2>
<p>
What I find very useful is to print/show pose figures or even whole photos to the model. It accelerate communication and you can get better result much faster. Especially with newbie models when you simply give them an option even to choice poses they like for beginning and then you can work on the others. Here are some poses guides which you can print easily, it is more than 400 poses all together for female and male models and for pairs. This resources I have found on the net, some of them such as "legendary" photocrack.com (site closed nowdays... yes again) I downloaded from <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20060721192257/http://www.photocrack.com/pages/download/ModelPose15.html  ">internet archive</a>. <br /><br />
Belive or not however there are not many free sites with such material. Most of them are simply promo to book or what ever paid site where you have no idea what are you going to get for your money. So enjoy and if you find more, please send me a link (post to discussion). Lets start <strong><a href="http://www.photodigital.net/zeltsman/">here</a></strong>, more links bellow. 
<br /><br />
Click on links bellow to download...   
<table border=0 cellspacing=10 align=center><tr>
<td><a href=http://www.photographytips.com/page.cfm/374><img src="http://www.howtoshot.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/posing-2-small.jpg" title="posing-2-small" width="198" height="256"  /></a></td>
<td><a href='http://www.howtoshot.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/poses_tips.pdf'><img src="http://www.howtoshot.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/posing-1-small.jpg" alt="poses tips" title="poses tips" width="198" height="256" /></a></td>
<td><a href="http://www.howtoshot.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/posenew.jpg"><img src="http://www.howtoshot.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/posing-3-small.jpg" alt="" title="posing-3-small" width="198" height="256"  /></a></td>
<td><a href='http://www.howtoshot.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/model-pose.exe'><img src="http://www.howtoshot.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/posing-4-small.jpg" alt="model pose" title="model pose" width="198" height="256" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-155" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><u><center><strong><a href="http://www.photographytips.com/page.cfm/374">1,378 poses for use on the iPhone or iPod Touch</a></strong></center></u></td>
<td><u><center><strong><a href='http://www.howtoshot.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/poses_tips.pdf'>Poses Tips PDF</a></strong></center></u></td>
<td><u><center><strong><a href="http://www.howtoshot.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/posenew.jpg">New Pose</a></strong></center></u></td>
<td><u><center><strong><a href='http://www.howtoshot.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/model-pose.exe'>Model Pose Exe</a></strong></center></u></td>
</tr>
</table>
<br /><br />
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-7035637283530791";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 90;
google_ad_format = "728x90_as";
google_ad_type = "text";
google_ad_channel = "";
google_color_border = "000000";
google_color_bg = "000000";
google_color_link = "FFFF00";
google_color_text = "FFFFFF";
google_color_url = "FFFF00";
google_ui_features = "rc:0";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
<br />
</p>

<h2>Update: Posing Techniques Videos</h2>
<p>
Just few days after I made this post I got some infos about video tutorials of posing techniques and photographing model portfolios on youtube. Here are some interesting ones:<br /><br />
<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/zkpHKZxSdp8?fs=1&amp;hl=cs_CZ"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/zkpHKZxSdp8?fs=1&amp;hl=cs_CZ" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/DRHwtLmzus4?fs=1&amp;hl=cs_CZ"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/DRHwtLmzus4?fs=1&amp;hl=cs_CZ" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZTOIfbe-SpY?fs=1&amp;hl=cs_CZ"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZTOIfbe-SpY?fs=1&amp;hl=cs_CZ" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/sDoQSG-zCI0?fs=1&amp;hl=cs_CZ"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/sDoQSG-zCI0?fs=1&amp;hl=cs_CZ" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

<!-- <strong><a href="http://www.modellportfolio.hu/pdf/modellpozok2.pdf">Poses Tricks Download</a></strong> -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.howtoshot.com/135/posing-guides-how-to-poses-for-female-model/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to fix front focus on Nikon D90 or D80&#8230; or back focus.</title>
		<link>http://www.howtoshot.com/82/how-to-fix-front-focus-nikon-d90-d80-back-focus-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.howtoshot.com/82/how-to-fix-front-focus-nikon-d90-d80-back-focus-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2010 22:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[back focus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[front focus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D70]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D7000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D80]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D90]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtoshot.com/?p=82</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Front focus and Back focus manual adjustment Front or back focusing can be a serious problem. You buy new Nikon camera and suddenly does not focus properly with old lenses. Very frustrating. And even more when you take all to the Nikon service and after one month they will send it back with result "everything [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Front focus and Back focus manual adjustment</h1>
<p ALIGN="justify"><img src="http://www.howtoshot.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Nikon-d90-focus-setting.jpg" alt="" title="Nikon-d90-focus-setting" width="300" height="225" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-87"  align="left"/>
Front or back focusing can be a serious problem. You buy new Nikon camera and suddenly does not focus properly with old lenses. Very frustrating. And even more when you take all to the Nikon service and after one month they will send it back with result "everything is in limit".  So lets talk about D90 back/front focus adjustment. How to adjust autofocus of your camera in 30 minutes. 
</p>
<br /><br /><span id="more-82"></span>
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-7035637283530791";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 90;
google_ad_format = "728x90_as";
google_ad_type = "text";
google_ad_channel = "";
google_color_border = "000000";
google_color_bg = "000000";
google_color_link = "FFFF00";
google_color_text = "FFFFFF";
google_color_url = "FFFF00";
google_ui_features = "rc:0";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
<br />
<p><br CLEAR="all" /></p>
<h2>Nikon DSLR Autofocus and View Finder system</h2>
<p>
<a href="http://www.howtoshot.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/nikon-d70-d80-d90-dslr-chart.jpg"><img src="http://www.howtoshot.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/nikon-d70-d80-d90-dslr-chart-300x273.jpg" alt="" title="nikon-d70-d80-d90-dslr-chart" width="300" height="273" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-85" /></a>
This article is based on several forum posts and especially original article of Sergei Khizhiy about back focus problem on Nikon D70 and later leongoodman.com. Links to the original articles are at the end. Important thing is that this method is not just for really strong back/front focus problem however also for fine tunning the camera. Even if you get the answer that everything is in limit or your camera works fine with expensive ethalon prime lens (which you obviously dont own). This can help you to get better focus with your current lens (if it has some focusing problem). Important note: <strong>AT YOUR OWN RISK. THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURE HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED BY NIKON</strong>
<br /><br />
On the left you can see basic design how the autofocus system of the D90 works. There are two mirrors. One for <strong>autofocus</strong> (AF) and one for manual focusing - <strong>viewfinder focus</strong> (VF). The general idea is that screw 1 and 2 are easy possible to adjust by hex key screw driver (also called Inbus or Imbus). And because they are even not hidden or covered, obviously they are here for adjusting purposes of the service. 
<br /><br />
<em>When you frame a picture, the light from the lens travels along path A (green). A fraction of the light beam goes through the semitransparent rectangular window in the main mirror and is reflected to the auto focus detectors (path C, magenta). When you take a shot, both VF and AF mirrors lock at the upper position, and the light hits the CCD directly by path B (yellow). Distances A, B, and C must be equal to some base distance D defined by Nikon engineers for their SLRs long time ago. </em>
<br /><br />
Because its is impossible to fine tune or even change the positions of the CCD/CMOS sensor or AF sensor, we have to find another way. There is also no way how to change this by software (so far from what i know), so this is the only way i find on the net. All you can is to change distances A and C by changing just a little bit the working angles of the corresponding mirrors. Basically, the mirrors should be positioned precisely at 45 degrees from the main optical axis of the camera and lens. These angles are maintained by the positions of the eccentrical stoppers, fine tuned by hex key screw 1 and 2. you can easily find them on the right side of the mirror chamber. This general design seems to be the same for Nikon D70 D80 D90. I do not know if its also for D7000. 

1. Print a good test pattern like the one used for testing at www.dpreview.com (ISO 12233). Stick it to a flat vertical surface in front of the camera and light it brightly to help manual focusing. 
2. Remove the lens, pull up the mirror, lock it in the upper position with an adhesive tape for convenience, mark the initial positions of the stoppers for a roll back, take a 2 mm hexagonal L-shaped wrench and rotate the AF stopper against its axis to a chosen direction by a few degrees. Then unlock the mirror and put the lens back. 
3. Mount the camera on a tripod and align it carefully against the test pattern. 
4. Set the Aperture Priority mode on the camera and use the fastest aperture available. 
5. Let the auto focus do its job and shoot. Then shoot two more pictures of the pattern with a manual correction of the focus by half a notch to either direction of the focusing ring (focus bracketing). The kit lens of the D70 allows you to do so simply by turning the focus ring while pressing the shutter release button half way. Check the user manual on that. 
6. Download the images to a computer and see which of the images is better: autofocused or manually corrected. This will give you a clue if you need to rotate the AF stopper some more or if you rotated it to the wrong direction and need to reverse it. Repeat steps 2...6 until you get a perfectly autofocused picture. 
7. Now that you have done with the auto focus, proceed to the calibration of the manual focus. It is done by turning the VF stopper to a certain direction by a few degrees. Keep adjusting the VF stopper position until you get the two following things at the same time: first, you must see the test pattern through the viewfinder perfectly in focus, and, second, you must see the confirmation sign of the auto focus (a green dot lit) in the bottom left corner of the viewfinder. 
8. Check the result by downloading images to a computer. Use focus bracketing to see that you get the best resolution with auto and manual focusing and without focus correction.
</p>
<p>
<h2></h2>
Here is the original Sergeys procedure:
<p>1. Print a good test pattern like the one used for testing at
www.dpreview.com (ISO 12233), for more see links at the end of this article. Stick it to a flat vertical surface in
front of the camera and light it brightly to help manual focusing. <br />
2. Remove the lens, pull up the mirror, lock it in the upper position
with an adhesive tape for convenience, mark the initial positions of
the stoppers for a roll back, take a 2 mm hexagonal L-shaped wrench and
rotate the AF stopper against its axis to a chosen direction by a few
degrees. Then unlock the mirror and put the lens back. <br />
3. Mount the camera on a tripod and align it carefully against the test
pattern. <br />
4. Set the Aperture Priority mode on the camera and use the fastest
aperture available. <br />
5. Let the auto focus do its job and shoot. Then shoot two more
pictures of the pattern with a manual correction of the focus by half a
notch to either direction of the focusing ring (focus bracketing). The
kit lens of the D70 alows you to do so simply by turning the focus ring
while pressing the shutter release button half way. Check the user
manual on that. <br />
6. Download the images to a computer and see which of the images is
better: autofocused or manually corrected. This will give you a clue if
you need to rotate the AF stopper some more or if you rotated it to the
wrong direction and need to reverse it. Repeat steps 2...6 until you
get a perfectly autofocused picture. <br />
7. Now that you have done with the auto focus, proceed to the
calibration of the manual focus. It is done by turning the VF stopper
to a certain direction by a few degrees. Keep adjusting the VF stopper
position until you get the two following things at the same time:
first, you must see the test pattern through the viewfinder perfectly
in focus, and, second, you must see the confirmation sign of the auto
focus (a green dot lit) in the bottom left corner of the viewfinder. <br />
8. Check the result by downloading images to a computer. Use focus
bracketing to see that you get the best resolution with auto and manual
focusing and without focus correction. </p>
</p>

<p>
<br /><br />
Some links to useful articles I get most of the information: Here are front/back focus test charts. There are several ways how to do it. Some people like the lines, another tiny texts. My suggestion is that you need both. 
<ul>
	<li>Line based front focus test chart: <a href="http://focustestchart.com/focus10.pdf">http://focustestchart.com/focus10.pdf</a></li>
	<li>Tiny text back focus test chart: <a href="http://www.leongoodman.com/d70/focus.pdf">http://www.leongoodman.com/d70/focus.pdf</a></li>
	<li><a href="http://leongoodman.com/sergei/backfocus.htm">http://leongoodman.com/sergei/backfocus.htm</a></li>
	<li><a href="http://www.leongoodman.com/d70focus.html">http://www.leongoodman.com/d70focus.html</a></li>
</ul>

Note: I post this article because I have difficulties to find relevant info about front focus Nikon D90. 
</p>
Note: I post this article because I have dificulties to find relevant info about front focus Nikon D90. ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.howtoshot.com/82/how-to-fix-front-focus-nikon-d90-d80-back-focus-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Going to upgrade: Nikon D90 vs Nikon D7000?</title>
		<link>http://www.howtoshot.com/40/nikon-d90-vs-nikon-d7000/</link>
		<comments>http://www.howtoshot.com/40/nikon-d90-vs-nikon-d7000/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 11:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Camera arena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D300s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D70]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D7000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D90]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtoshot.com/?p=40</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nikon D7000 vs Nikon D90 It is always very interesting to follow whats going on at better-amateur camera market. Especially from Nikon point of view, because this company deliver new model line every year. :) This time they claim Nikon D7000 is not succesor of Nikon D90. Is it true? No one really care, important [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Nikon D7000 vs Nikon D90</h1>
<p ALIGN="justify"> <img src="/pics/vs.png" width="218" height="97" alt="Canon EOS 400D vs Nikon 40x" border="0" align="left">
It is always very interesting to follow whats going on at better-amateur camera market. Especially from Nikon point of view, because this company deliver new model line every year. :) This time they claim Nikon D7000 is not succesor of Nikon D90. Is it true? No one really care, important is a fact if its good camera to buy now days or not. Why I am thinking about? Well.. I have to upgrade my old D70!
.</p>
<br /><br /><span id="more-40"></span>
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-7035637283530791";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 90;
google_ad_format = "728x90_as";
google_ad_type = "text";
google_ad_channel = "";
google_color_border = "000000";
google_color_bg = "000000";
google_color_link = "FFFF00";
google_color_text = "FFFFFF";
google_color_url = "FFFF00";
google_ui_features = "rc:0";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
<br />
<p><br CLEAR="all" /></p>
<h2>mid-range camera, high-end result</h2>
<p>First of all do not be ashamed of buying these cameras. I meet some people who bought Nikon D300s just because they want to look better. From the other I remember several pros who bought Nikon D70 along to their Nikon D2x for just oposite reason: lower weight, low profile and good-enough picture quality. And especially Nikon D7000 is built very well. Well.. .Canon users have much better life here. There are just few models... every one knows that 500D is starter, 50D can be used even by pro. 5D is definitely pro and 1D or Eos 1Ds Mark III... there is nothing to talk about. However even Canon start to confuse their users by new Canon 7D (which is not direct successor of 5D) and Canon 60D which is definitely not better than Canon 50D. So at the end... they have the same. :)
</p>
<p>The real difference between pro and non-pro cameras are just few features which are not important
for average photographer:
</p>
<ul TYPE="circle">
<li>Megapixels for huge prints and picture quality in extreme conditions - however here it does not count at all D7000 has more Mpx than Nikon D300s</li>
<li>Autofocus for extreme condition (mean fast and very accurate)... also not a case for D7000</li>
<li>Anti-dust and watter proof protection</li>
<li>Fast shutter speed and FPS</li>
<li>Studio ready features</li>
<li>fast control layout</li>
<li>Metal body... shutter with warranty (at least 100 000 pictures)</li>
<li>And few more...</li>
Well... when I read this... it seems to me the ambitious of Nikon D7000 are really higher. :)
</ul>
<p>Megapixels are not a case anymore. Even with 4 Mpx you can make A3 prints. Sometimes I even thing it is worse: more Mpx better computer you need for postprocessing. Come on, i can not edit easily 20Mpx pictures on my PC! Studio is clear and most of the families are not having their own
photo studio at home. Fast control layout means more levers and switch which are cool for professionals and pretty confusing for my mother. However this is not about pro cameras, it is about Nikon D7000 and D90</p>

<h2>Real difference</h2>
<p>As always I am gonna to disappoint everybody who expect long article about technical differences between these two cameras. When we see the price tag, D700 is 500 USD more than D90. What are we paying for here: more Mpx, metal body, faster speed, better AF, better video, more pro controls, better ISO. Well everything which most of the user consider to be a reason to buy Nikon D300s. Here it looks that everything what Nikon says about D7000 to not be direct successor of the D90 is true. However there is another fact: whenever new Nikon arrive it is always a little bit overpriced. Lets see basic facts:

</p>
<table width="700" border="1" bordercolor="#ffffff">
<tr>
	<td></td>
	<td>Nikon D300s</td>	
	<td>Nikon D200</td>
	<td>Nikon D80</td>
	<td><font color="#00FF00">Nikon D90</font></td>
	<td><font color="#00FF00">Nikon D7000</font><br /></td>	
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Sensor</strong><br />(Megapixels)</td>
	<td>12.3 Mpx CMOS</td>
	<td>10 Mpx CCD</td>
	<td>10 Mpx CCD</td>
	<td>12.3 Mpx CMOS</td>
	<td>16.2 Mpx CMOS</td>	
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Crop factor</strong></td>
	<td>1.5</td>
	<td>1.5</td>
	<td>1.5</td>	
	<td>1.5</td>		
	<td>1.5</td>	
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Shutter time</strong><br />max. time of shutter</td>
	<td>1/8000</td>	
	<td>1/8000</td>
	<td>1/4000</td>
	<td>1/4000</td>
	<td>1/8000</td>	
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Continuous shooting</strong><br />machinegun mode (frames per second)</td>
	<td>7 fps</td>		
	<td>6 fps</td>	
	<td>3 fps</td>
	<td>4.5 fps</td>
	<td>6 fps</td>	
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Flash X-sync</strong> max. time that can be used with flash</td>
	<td>1/250, up to 1/320<br />with reduced GN (flash power)</td>	
	<td>1/250</td>
	<td>1/200</td>
	<td>1/200</td>
	<td>1/200</td>	
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Sensitivity - ISO</strong></td>
	<td>100-3200 (6400)</td>	
	<td>100-1600 (3200)</td>
	<td>100-1600 (3200)</td>
	<td>200-3200 (6400)</td>
	<td>200-3200 (25600)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>live view</strong>LCD as a viewfinder</td>
	<td>Y</td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">Y</font></td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">Y</font></td>	
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Built-in flash power</strong><br />speedlight, GN ISO 200</td>
	<td>18</td>	
	<td>18</td>
	<td>18</td>
	<td>17</td>
	<td>17</td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Storage type</strong></td>
	<td>SD + CF</td>	
	<td>CF</td>
	<td>SD+SDHC</td>
	<td>SD+SDHC</td>
	<td>SD+SDHC</td>	
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>AF lock / no. focus points</strong></td>
	<td>Y/51</td>	
	<td>Y/11</td>
	<td>Y/11</td>
	<td>Y/11</td>
	<td>Y/39</td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Command dials</strong></td>
	<td>2</td>	
	<td>2</td>
	<td>2</td>
	<td>2</td>
	<td>2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Depth of field preview button</strong></td>
	<td>Y</td>	
	<td>Y</td>
	<td>Y</td>
	<td>Y</td>
	<td>Y</td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>2. status LCD</strong></td>
	<td>Y</td>	
	<td>Y</td>
	<td>Y</td>
	<td>Y</td>
	<td>Y</td>	
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Buitt-in flash commander / no. chanels</strong></td>
	<td>Y</td>
	<td>Y</td>
	<td>Y</td>
	<td>Y</td>
	<td>Y</td>
</tr>
</table><br /><br />
<img src="http://a.img-dpreview.com/previews/NikonD7000/images/comparedtoD90front-001.jpg" width="660" height="250" alt="Nikon D7000 vs Nikon D90" border="0">
<br clear="all">
<div align="center">Dimension and weight
<br />
The same... just D7000 is 76g heavier. Not real difference. 
</div>
<h2>Nikon D7000 performance</h2>
<p>
when we see it from performance point of view, the only thing what D7000 shares with D90 is the design. It is not like Nikon D80 vs D90, which can be consider to be facelift. New shutter release (better, faster), new expo metering (more segments), more AF points and cross elements, better body, faster fps. In some way it is even better than Nikon D300s. Here Nikon has to reduce ambitious of D7000, so it simply make it slower in machine gun mode and reduce buffer (also important for sport photography... less pictures can be taken in high speed mode). I really belive that D7000 can be easily what I saw in the times of Nikon D70: low cost, low profile, 2nd body even for professional photographers. The ability to use also old Nikkor AI lenses just confirming this theory. The only question is if its worth of money. Well... you get "almost" Nikon D300s, you pay for "almost" D300. It seems to be fair. :)
</p>

<h2>Final result</h2>
<p>
Well... after all I am thinking of buy Nikon D90. Why? It is always better to let new model on the market and see. New firmware arrive, they sometimes recall battery to the service. After year or two it is very clear what is real value and potential. If I buy D7000 now, I get for price of Nikon D300 "just better" Nikon D90. For the price different I can buy nice second hand lens such us 12-24/4 ("FX people" now selling that lenses because of their new full frame FX camera like Nikon D3x or D700). I remember that even my Nikon D70 i bought when D70s was already on the market and I did not like the price tag. Maybe there is a question why I did not want to take Nikon D300 or D300s. Here are my thought about: Nikon D300 is cool and nice however it is heavy and I did not appreciate anything it has better than D90. Whats more, it is bigger than D90 and I do not want to buy new bag. Maybe stupid reason however I am getting old and I hate to bulky things. :) Anyway... I am going yo some discussion to let other oppose my ideas. 
</p>
<br />
<br /><!--more-->
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-7035637283530791";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 90;
google_ad_format = "728x90_as";
google_ad_type = "text";
google_ad_channel = "";
google_color_border = "000000";
google_color_bg = "000000";
google_color_link = "FFFF00";
google_color_text = "FFFFFF";
google_color_url = "FFFF00";
google_ui_features = "rc:0";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
<br /><br />
Well... what do you think about Nikon D90 and Nikon D7000... is the D7000 real successor or just different model as Nikon trying to convince us? :)
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.howtoshot.com/40/nikon-d90-vs-nikon-d7000/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to made softbox for 10 USD</title>
		<link>http://www.howtoshot.com/34/how-to-made-softbox-for-10-usd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.howtoshot.com/34/how-to-made-softbox-for-10-usd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 10:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtoshot.com/?p=34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Home made softbox Every photographer have been thinking about buying softbox lights at least once. However especially for amateurs there is a question of need and if its good idea to spend few hunders bucks for softbox or should I buy new lens instead. Since I have been thinking in the same way I decided [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Home made softbox</h1>
<p ALIGN="justify"> 
<img src="/pics/softbox2.jpg" width="218" height="223" alt="" border="0" align="left"> 

Every photographer have been thinking about buying softbox lights at least once. However especially for amateurs there is a question of need and if its good idea to spend few hunders bucks for softbox or should I buy new lens instead.</p>
<p><span id="more-34"></span>Since I have been thinking in the same way I decided to do softbox by myself and found out that very basic think can be done for 20 USD maximum. How? Lets make a list what we need:</p>

<br />
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-7035637283530791";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 90;
google_ad_format = "728x90_as";
google_ad_type = "text";
google_ad_channel = "";
google_color_border = "000000";
google_color_bg = "000000";
google_color_link = "FFFF00";
google_color_text = "FFFFFF";
google_color_url = "FFFF00";
google_ui_features = "rc:0";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
<br /><br />

<h2>What we need</h2>
<p>For homemade softbox studiolight we need following:</p>
<ul TYPE="circle">
<li>Big Nutella package :)</li>
<li>2x "Universal underlay", no idea how its call corectly in english. Anyway It is simply 
silver underlay that protect you when you sleep in nature (protecting human budy from 
humidity and temperature when you lay down in the forest).</li>
<li>1x light diffuser, simply something what makes light softer. You can use what ever. 
If you have Collapsible Reflector Disc with semi-transparent white fabric, you win. Easyest 
way is to buy 1 meter of curtain without any texture/pattern. 
Such a small piece you can get even free in special shops with curtains.</li>
<li>4x wooden Lath (thiniest one), for framing front rectangle of softbox</li>
<li>Sticky tape, stickers, binder and pencil.</li>
<li>Flash light</li>
</ul>
<p>Make a template from paper of final form. You will need for several reasons: first you wanna
to make same sides of the softbox, second its better to make a paper model first because its 
quite dificult to make it right at first try. Do not forget that you need few cm (1 inch) on the 
borders. I have used A3 paper for template. When you have temlate simply copy it to underlay and 
make sides of softbox which you can put together by binder. Sticky tape you can youse for 
finishing. The rest is clear i think, just use tripod as softbox stand and you win.</p>
<h2>Results</h2>
<p>Its is definitevly not the pro version of softbox which you can use outside however for
playing and fun its not that bad. Here are the results:</p>
<p><br CLEAR="all" /></p>
<div ALIGN="center"><img BORDER="0" HEIGHT="700" WIDTH="466" SRC="/pics/softbox.jpg" /></div><br />
<br />
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-7035637283530791";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 90;
google_ad_format = "728x90_as";
google_ad_type = "text";
google_ad_channel = "";
google_color_border = "000000";
google_color_bg = "000000";
google_color_link = "FFFF00";
google_color_text = "FFFFFF";
google_color_url = "FFFF00";
google_ui_features = "rc:0";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
<br /><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.howtoshot.com/34/how-to-made-softbox-for-10-usd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to shoot landscape pictures</title>
		<link>http://www.howtoshot.com/21/how-to-shoot-landscape-pictures/</link>
		<comments>http://www.howtoshot.com/21/how-to-shoot-landscape-pictures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 14:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How to]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtoshot.com/21/how-to-shoot-landscape-pictures/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Landscape photos are easy! Landscaapes... most of peoplelove it. There are nice colorful with lot of details. Why in hell none of my picture looks the same? Probably I do not have Eur 5000+ camera equipment. No no. The truth is much simplier. Hot to shoot landscape? Hot to make landscape pictures? Lets have a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Landscape photos are easy!</h1>
<p ALIGN="justify">
<img src="/pics/landscape-photo-small.jpg" width="218" height="145" alt="landscape photos with photomatix" border="0" align="left">
Landscaapes... most of peoplelove it. There are nice colorful with lot of details. Why in hell none of
my picture looks the same? Probably I do not have Eur 5000+ camera equipment. No no. The truth is
much simplier. Hot to shoot landscape? Hot to make landscape pictures? Lets have a look 
hot to do it step-by-step. Simple manual how to make landscape that all of your friends
say just wow.  UPDATED: 10/2010 
</p>
<br /><span id="more-21"></span>
<p><br CLEAR="all" /></p>
<!-- AD -->
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-7035637283530791";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 90;
google_ad_format = "728x90_as";
google_ad_type = "text";
google_ad_channel = "";
google_color_border = "000000";
google_color_bg = "000000";
google_color_link = "FFFF00";
google_color_text = "FFFFFF";
google_color_url = "FFFF00";
google_ui_features = "rc:0";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
<br /><br />

<h2>Any camera can produce wonderful landscape</h2>
<p>I am really sorry but you do not need to buy new camera. Here are list of thing we need to make
nice landscape pictures. Basically we have two parts of our work. One is field work - you need to 
shoot landscape somewhere. You probably can not use any of your older pictures because their are 
simply bad for this purposes. Two is a bit of photoshop magic or better call that digital black
chamber work. Do not worry. It takes 5 minutes no more! 
</p>
<p>You will need this:</p>
<ul TYPE="circle">
<li>Any camera (with some manual control is better)</li>
<li>Tripod</li>
<li>Circular polarizer filter (higly recomended)</li>
<li>Good weather condition (no landscape is nice without clouds, sundown, sunrise... sun and noon-time is not a case here at all!)</li>
<li>Some software, here we are going to use <a href="http://www.hdrsoft.com/" target="_blank">HDRsoft Photomatix</a></li>
<li>Mars bar :)))</li>
</ul>

<h2>Lets go shooting</h2>
<p>Go to the woods and find some nice scenery. Put your camera on tripod. Now we are going to shoot more pictures that 
has to be exactly same except exposition. These pictures we are going to compose to get one which much higher dynamic range.
If your camera support bracketing feature use it (set 3 pictures witch step 1 EV). Bracketing means that camera by itself make
more images at once with different exposition. No bracketing? Do not cry about. You simply shoot one picture on 
auto mode then set exposition compensation down (-1 EV) and shoot another one. 2 pictures can be enough however always make
3 (+1 EV). No one never know which one you need. Try to focus on closer subject if you know how (rock on 
the picture for example).<br /></p>
<img src="/pics/landscape-photo-1.jpg" width="600" height="399" alt="" border="0"><br clear="all">
<p>Important thing is that all pictureas has to be exactly same so do not move with camera. If your camera support bracketing
try to use selftimer to avoid any handshaking. Better pictures you have larger landscape you can produce (better details).
Result should look like this (yes this kind of pictures we usually get):<br /></p>
<img src="/pics/landscape-photomatix-5.jpg" width="500" height="150" alt="" border="0"><br clear="all">
<p><strong>Note for the lucky ones who having manual controls:</strong> To get best results set lowest ISO (means
best quality), high Aperture - f8 on compact cameras (usually maximum) and f16 on DSLR (no more because
average lens giving best result around this) and focus on 1.5 m for wide picture (this distance is close to 
hyper focal lenght which means everything above 1.5 m be sharp). </p>

<h2>Honey, I'am home!</h2>
<p>So lets start our computer work. Run Photomatix and get this<br /></p>
<img src="/pics/photomatix-1.jpg" width="500" height="276" alt="" border="0"><br clear="all">
<p>Our case is probably second option so lets continue. Open pictures you made in
nature. Be sure they are the same (if not the result will be pretty blurred. Sometimes
you have to use just pictures because of handshaking or wind blowing - it has moved camera or
plants on the picture). When you open them it should look like this:<br /></p>
<img src="/pics/photomatix-2.jpg" width="500" height="381" alt="" border="0"><br clear="all">
<p>Menu HDRI -> Generate HDR. As result you get very strange looking picture. Do not worry
about it.<br /></p>
<img src="/pics/landscape-photomatix-3.jpg" width="500" height="381" alt="" border="0"><br clear="all">
<p>Menu HDRI -> Tone Mapping. And now we are getting to interesting part which you 
will like the best:<br /></p>
<img src="/pics/landscape-photomatix-4.1.jpg" width="500" height="278" alt="" border="0"><br clear="all">
<p>Now we have to tune our picture. (1) is control of dynamic of the picture. Usually is
better to not using max so -5 is best here. (2) is histogram control. Good picture need
shades as well as shine parts. Try to make histogram wide by black and white point 
controls. Last control is whole saturation of the picture. Its all upon you: wanna colorfull 
picture or rainy-like dark scenery? My setting here are following: <br /></p>
<img src="/pics/landscape-photomatix-4.jpg" width="500" height="342" alt="" border="0"><br clear="all">
<p>And thats it. Easy, dont you think? The final result in this case is here:<br /></p>
<img src="/pics/landscape-photo-2.jpg" width="600" height="399" alt="" border="0"><br clear="all"><br />
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>There is nothing to conlcude... I whish you luck!
<br />
</p>
<!-- AD -->
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-7035637283530791";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 90;
google_ad_format = "728x90_as";
google_ad_type = "text";
google_ad_channel = "";
google_color_border = "000000";
google_color_bg = "000000";
google_color_link = "FFFF00";
google_color_text = "FFFFFF";
google_color_url = "FFFF00";
google_ui_features = "rc:0";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
<br /><br />
<br />
Well... what do you think about?
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.howtoshot.com/21/how-to-shoot-landscape-pictures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D300 vs D700 or Nikon D3 vs D700! Which one is better?</title>
		<link>http://www.howtoshot.com/28/nikon-d300-vs-d700-or-nikon-d3-vs-d700-which-one-is-better/</link>
		<comments>http://www.howtoshot.com/28/nikon-d300-vs-d700-or-nikon-d3-vs-d700-which-one-is-better/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 16:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtoshot.com/?p=28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nikon D300 vs D700 ... Nikon D700 vs D3 Tima is running and again, we have the same question however in newer jacket. Which one is better? We are not going to talk about Canon D5. Now it is good time to decide if the older model is good enough to buy or not since [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Nikon D300 vs D700 ... Nikon D700 vs D3</h1>
<p ALIGN="justify"> 
<img src="/pics/d300smallcrop.jpg" width="218" height="134" alt="Nikon D300" border="0" align="left">
Tima is running and again, we have the same question however in newer jacket. Which one is better? We are not going to talk about Canon D5. Now it is good time to decide if the older model is 
good enough to buy or not since the price of the older one will go down very soon. Same story again. :)</p>
<br /><span id="more-28"></span>
<p><br CLEAR="all" /></p>
<br />
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-7035637283530791";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 90;
google_ad_format = "728x90_as";
google_ad_type = "text_image";
google_ad_channel = "";
google_color_border = "000000";
google_color_bg = "000000";
google_color_link = "FFFF00";
google_color_text = "FFFFFF";
google_color_url = "FFFF00";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
<br /><br />

<h2>Why to buy Nikon D300 now?</h2>
<p>Maybe we wanna the best of the best and we want it now. However we should think about the older
version Nikon D200 because its price is going down and it could be enough for our needs. Lets have a look on both and try to find difference. I know D200 nowdays is gonne... so D300 is simply best gear to everyone who needs profesional build body. Everyone else should also think about lower models such us Nikon D90 and latest Nikon D7000. Why? They have some easy-to-use features, they are much lighter and result and not that far away. And do not forget about price tag! 
</p>
<h2>Nikon D300 Key Features</h2>
<p>These ones you can on Nikon D700 as well however...</p>
<ul TYPE="circle">
<li>12.3 megapixel CMOS senso (dx format -> crop 1.5x)</li>
<li>Self-cleaning sensor (vibration agains dust)</li>
<li>3.0" LCD monitor (0.9Mpx), can be used as viewfinder!</li>
<li>Really fast operation (powerup 13 ms, shutter lag 45 ms, blackout 100 ms)</li>
<li>Improved autofocus (AF): 51 points, tracking by color, auto-focus calibration up to 20 separate settings by lens</li>
<li>6 fps (frame per second - machine gun mode)</li>
<li>you keeping your DX lens collection :)</li>
<li>And more...</li>
</ul>

<p>There is much more I just tried to find the most important features which makes Nikon D700 
unique now and especially when we are going to comparte that to Nikon D300.</p>
<h2>Nikon D300 vs. D700 main differences</h2>
<p>Lets have a look on our difference sheet</p>

<table width="600" border="1" bordercolor="#ffffff">
<tr>
	<td></td>
	<td><font color="#00FF00">Nikon D300</font></td>	
	<td><font color="#00FF00">Nikon D700</td>
	<td>Nikon D80</td>
	<td>Nikon D40x</td>
	<td>Nikon D3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Sensor</strong><br />(Megapixels)</td>
	<td>12.3 Mpx CMOS</td>
	<td>10 Mpx CCD</td>
	<td>10 Mpx CCD</td>
	<td>10 Mpx CCD</td>
	<td>6 Mpx CCD</td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>exposure metering</strong></td>
	<td>1005 seg. RGB<br />(2. generation)</td>	
	<td>1005 seg. RGB<br />(2. generation)</td>
	<td>420 seg. RGB<br />(2. generation)</td>
	<td>420 seg. RGB<br />(2. generation)</td>
	<td>420 seg. RGB<br />(2. generation)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Shutter time</strong><br />max. time of shutter</td>
	<td>1/8000</td>	
	<td>1/8000</td>
	<td>1/4000</td>
	<td>1/4000</td>
	<td>1/4000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Continuous shooting</strong><br />machinegun mode (frames per second)</td>
	<td>6 fps, up to 8 fps<br />with grip</td>		
	<td>5 fps</td>	
	<td>3 fps</td>
	<td>3 fps</td>
	<td>2.6 fps</td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Flash X-sync</strong> max. time that can be used with flash</td>
	<td>1/250, up to 1/320<br />with reduced GN (flash power)</td>	
	<td>1/250</td>
	<td>1/200</td>
	<td>1/200</td>
	<td>1/200</td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Sensitivity - ISO</strong></td>
	<td>100-1600 (6400)</td>	
	<td>100-1600 (3200)</td>
	<td>100-1600 (3200)</td>
	<td>100-3200</td>
	<td>200-3200</td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>live view</strong>LCD as a viewfinder</td>
	<td>Y</td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Built-in flash power</strong><br />speedlight, GN ISO 200</td>
	<td>18</td>	
	<td>18</td>
	<td>18</td>
	<td>17</td>
	<td>17</td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Battery power</strong></td>
	<td>1500 mAh</td>	
	<td>1500 mAh</td>
	<td>1500 mAh</td>
	<td>1000 mAh</td>
	<td>1000 mAh</td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Storage type</strong></td>
	<td>CF (UDMA)</td>	
	<td>CF</td>
	<td>SD+SDHC</td>
	<td>SD+SDHC</td>
	<td>SD+SDHC</td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>AF lock / no. focus points</strong></td>
	<td>Y/51</td>	
	<td>Y/11</td>
	<td>Y/11</td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font>/3</td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font>/3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Command dials</strong></td>
	<td>2</td>	
	<td>2</td>
	<td>2</td>
	<td>1</td>
	<td>1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>AF mode control switch</strong></td>
	<td>Y</td>	
	<td>Y</td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Depth of field preview button</strong></td>
	<td>Y</td>	
	<td>Y</td>
	<td>Y</td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Remote cord connector</strong></td>
	<td>Y</td>
	<td>Y</td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Wireless Remote Control</strong></td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>	
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
	<td>Y</td>
	<td>Y</td>
	<td>Y</td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>2. status LCD</strong></td>
	<td>Y</td>	
	<td>Y</td>
	<td>Y</td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Buitt-in flash commander / no. chanels</strong></td>
	<td>Y/2</td>	
	<td>Y/2</td>
	<td>Y/2</td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Non AF-S lens compatibility</strong><br />Old lens full suport</td>
	<td>Y</td>	
	<td>Y</td>
	<td>Y</td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
</tr>
</table><br /><br />
<img src="/pics/nikon-d200-vs-nikon-d300.jpg" width="694" height="250" alt="nikon-d200-vs-nikon-d300" border="0">
<br clear="all">
<div align="center">Nikon D200 vs Nikon D300: same size just 5g difference (D200)</div>
<br />
<h2>Nikon D700</h2>
<p>
Well... in my opiniom "just" fullframe version of D700. Smallest full frame camera from Nikon now days. If you have an ambitious for full frame... or you want to change almost all lenses you have. D700 is the rigth choice. Why not D3? Simply D3 is very heavy... even withou flash built in. :) I think D3s is to serious for most of the people. Its like 5D vs 1Ds... people often take 5D because they dont like builky stuff. 
</P>
<br />
<h2>Nikon D3</h2>
<p>
The Nikon D3 is the only Nikon pro camera nowdays. It is the biggest, bulkiest, fastest, heaviest, toughest, most expensive with the fattest and longest lasting battery. Newier version is called D3s, as always. I have to admit, after a years... this is a great camera. Not for everyone, however for pros... finally some clear alternative to Canon EOS 1 Ds mark III and for much better price. 

The D3 is the camera to get for action and sports. Its AF system is superb extra fast. You no longer have to pick and chose AF sensors, or have to focus, lock and recompose. When you set it up as I do, you just compose and fire, and everything comes out perfectly. The frame rate of 9 FPS is the easy part, however not fastest nowdays.
</p><br /><br />
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-7035637283530791";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 90;
google_ad_format = "728x90_as";
google_ad_type = "text_image";
google_ad_channel = "";
google_color_border = "000000";
google_color_bg = "000000";
google_color_link = "FFFF00";
google_color_text = "FFFFFF";
google_color_url = "FFFF00";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script><br /><br />
<br />
Well... what do you think about new D300?
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.howtoshot.com/28/nikon-d300-vs-d700-or-nikon-d3-vs-d700-which-one-is-better/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flash lighting samples</title>
		<link>http://www.howtoshot.com/27/flash-lighting-samples/</link>
		<comments>http://www.howtoshot.com/27/flash-lighting-samples/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How to]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtoshot.com/27/flash-lighting-samples/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Photo flash light with umbrella Intro One day, almost every photographer decide or at least start to think about his own studio. The easiest way is to make some kind of amateur studio (atelier) at home. The problem is to find some relevant info or how tos. There just a few articals about this important [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Photo flash light with umbrella</h1>
<p ALIGN="justify"> 
<img src="/pics/softbox2.jpg" width="218" height="223" alt="" border="0" align="left"> 
<strong>Intro</strong><br /><br />
One day, almost every photographer decide or at least start to think about his own studio. The easiest way is to make some kind of amateur studio (atelier) at home. The problem is to find some relevant info or how tos. There just a few articals about this important topic for beginers or people without good infos or
friends whit such know how. <span id="more-27"></span>I have written <a href=http://fotaky.xf.cz/Blesky_a_destniky.html>this artical in czech</a> years ago however its is
still relevant even today. 
<br /><br />
Lighting is the key of a lot of types of pictures. We are not going to talk about
expensive soft boxes and pro lighting. The only thing we use is the Nikon DSLR with one wireless TTL comanded flash (Nikon SB-800). The brand here is absolutely not important here, you can get the same with Canon, Pentax, Sony, Panasonic or Sigma. We also use 5-in-1 light reflector / diffuser and some 
cheap umbrellas (rain umbrellas :)).
<br /><br />
 <strong>What we need here?</strong><br /><br />
Not much and not very expensive staff...<br /><br />
<ul type="circle">
	<li><strong>Nikon D70</strong> - old DSLR as camera and flash commander.  
	aperiture 5,6, time 1/160, iso 200, white ballance - auto, flash in commander mode.  
	<li><strong>Nikon SB-800</strong> - our main light source. Setings: remote TTL with difusion dome and adapter (14mm). 
	<li><strong>Holder</strong> - we need to hold external flash outside camera, the same whit diffusor and umbrella.
	<li><strong>Silver umbrella</strong> - original photo umbrella, cost 30,- USD 
	<li><strong>Silver semitransparent umbrella "Tesco"</strong> - low cost, low quality Tesco umbrella for 2,- USD (or free). The main advantage of this umbrella is the fact that it is half transparent. You can use it as a diffusor or reflect umbrella. The color is about bluesilvergrey something. 	
	<li><strong>Reflector 5-IN-1</strong> - we use it as diffusor to make "softbox" efect.	
</ul>

<br /><br />
 <strong>No a jak to dopadlo?</strong><br /><br />
Nebudeme to protahovat, jdeme se podívat na výsledky:<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<img src="http://www.howtoshot.com//pics/flash_umbrella_light_samples/destniky.jpg" width="692" height="460" alt="" border="0"><br CLEAR="all" />
Here is the scene set up and again, camera settings f5.6, 1/160 a ISO 200.
<br /><br />	
	
	<img src="http://www.howtoshot.com//pics/flash_umbrella_light_samples/DSC_5785.jpg" width="692" height="460" alt="" border="0"><br CLEAR="all" />
Picture number one: original scene, no special light is used. Just original lighting in the room. We used 1/2 S for shutter. Important area of all picture is around the loudspeaker and on the nose and neck.
<br /><br /><br />

<img src="http://www.howtoshot.com//pics/flash_umbrella_light_samples/DSC_5783.jpg" width="692" height="460" alt="" border="0"><br CLEAR="all" />
Here we have first lighting, direct flash light. What we see is the sharp shadows and very good light on whole picture. 
<br /><br /><br />

<img src="http://www.howtoshot.com//pics/flash_umbrella_light_samples/DSC_5778.jpg" width="692" height="460" alt="" border="0"><br CLEAR="all" />
Here we see usage of the silver umbrella (photo type). Very hard and direct light. We can say even agressive. Shadows are a bit softer. We see double shadows around loudspeaker due reflections of the walls and umbrella. 
<br /><br /><br />

<img src="http://www.howtoshot.com//pics/flash_umbrella_light_samples/DSC_5777.jpg" width="692" height="460" alt="" border="0"><br CLEAR="all" />
Tesco umbrella as reflector is softer than previous. Light is also with better coverage on the picture thanks to the light which comes through the umbrella. Shadows are not agressive. We also see that there is no big problem with white balance which we could expected. 
<br /><br /><br />

<img src="http://www.howtoshot.com//pics/flash_umbrella_light_samples/DSC_5779.jpg" width="692" height="460" alt="" border="0"><br CLEAR="all" />
Tesco umbrella as diffuser. Shadows are very soft and the light is very close to 
softbox type of lighting. 
<br /><br /><br />

<img src="http://www.howtoshot.com//pics/flash_umbrella_light_samples/DSC_5779.jpg" width="692" height="460" alt="" border="0"><br CLEAR="all" />
Here we used 5-in-1 diffuser used as open softbox. The light is soft and shadows
very decent. 
<br /><br /><br />
<br /><br />
 <strong>Result</strong><br /><br />
There is no something like an result, which light is the winner. Every pohotographer is hunting good light for the rest of his light. Without good
lighting there is not good picture. The best lighting is the natural light and
maybe you have asked yourself why I have choiced such a strange scene for my
test. The answer is to compare with some of my older shots when natural sun light comming through window were used:<br />
<img src="http://www.howtoshot.com//pics/flash_umbrella_light_samples/Image500.jpg" width="700" height="475" alt="" border="0">
<br />
<br /><br /></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.howtoshot.com/27/flash-lighting-samples/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D200 vs. D300 part II.</title>
		<link>http://www.howtoshot.com/26/nikon-d200-vs-d300-sample-images-gallery/</link>
		<comments>http://www.howtoshot.com/26/nikon-d200-vs-d300-sample-images-gallery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 18:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Camera arena]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtoshot.com/26/nikon-d200-vs-d300-sample-images-gallery/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[D200 vs. D300: sample pics Few days ago I have posted small artical about comparsion of Nikon D200 vs D300. Now I found Nikon D300 sample gallery on some chinese forum. So lets heck it out and see its noise and detail capability. Its still good time to decide if the older model is good [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>D200 vs. D300: sample pics</h1>
<p ALIGN="justify"> 
<img src="/pics/d300smallcrop.jpg" width="218" height="134" alt="Nikon D300" border="0" align="left">
Few days ago I have posted small artical about comparsion of Nikon D200 vs D300. Now I found 
Nikon D300 sample gallery on some chinese forum. So lets heck it out and see its noise and
detail capability. Its still good time to decide if the older model is 
good enough or not. D300 or D200? That is the question...</p>
<br /><span id="more-26"></span>
<p><br CLEAR="all" /></p>
<br />
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-7035637283530791";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 90;
google_ad_format = "728x90_as";
google_ad_type = "text_image";
google_ad_channel = "";
google_color_border = "000000";
google_color_bg = "000000";
google_color_link = "FFFF00";
google_color_text = "FFFFFF";
google_color_url = "FFFF00";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
<br /><br />

<h2>Nikon D300 sample pictures gallery</h2>
<p>Browsing on my favourite forum and finding out nice link with real sample pictures from 
D300. So ladies and gentlemans here is brand new 
<a target="_blank" href="http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.520dc.com%2Fread.php%3Ftid%3D13910&#038;langpair=zh%7Cen&#038;hl=en&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;oe=UTF-8&#038;prev=%2Flanguage_tools">Nikon D300 sample gallery</a>.
Its well done and you can compare details, noise reduction etc. there. Original non-translated link 
is <a href="http://www.520dc.com/read.php?tid=13910">here</a>.
<br /><br />
Anyway... still thinking that buying Nikon D200 in sale is better option for me. All 
Nikon D200 vs D300 battle seems to be pretty interesting. Btw. Where is Canon and its 40D? Or Canon 50D? 
<br /><br />
My last post about this topic: <a href="http://www.howtoshot.com/20/d200-vs-d300-nikon-d300-better-than-nikon-d200/">Nikon d300 better than Nikon d200?</a>
</p>

<br /><br />
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-7035637283530791";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 90;
google_ad_format = "728x90_as";
google_ad_type = "text_image";
google_ad_channel = "";
google_color_border = "000000";
google_color_bg = "000000";
google_color_link = "FFFF00";
google_color_text = "FFFFFF";
google_color_url = "FFFF00";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script><br /><br />
<br />
Well... what do you think about D300 vs. D200 battle?
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.howtoshot.com/26/nikon-d200-vs-d300-sample-images-gallery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pictures from Israel</title>
		<link>http://www.howtoshot.com/25/pictures-from-israel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.howtoshot.com/25/pictures-from-israel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 22:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pictures from]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtoshot.com/25/pictures-from-israel/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lets go to Israel! Israel, small country with high media coverage. Country some people dream about. Some ones hate it. The others fighting for and the rest is afraid of. Me and two friends of mine decided to make a short trip to israel and try to visit all places we have heard about from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Lets go to Israel!</h1>
<p ALIGN="justify">
<img src="/pics/israel/israel-tank.jpg" width="218" height="145" alt="israel trip" border="0" align="left">
Israel, small country with high media coverage. Country some people dream about. Some ones hate it. The others
fighting for and the rest is afraid of. Me and two friends of mine decided to make a short trip to 
israel and try to visit all places we have heard about from news and bible. So this is photo report of 
our israel trip because my camera made me a company of course! So pictures from Israel!
</p>
<br /><span id="more-25"></span>
<p><br CLEAR="all" /></p>
<!-- AD --><br />
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-7035637283530791";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 90;
google_ad_format = "728x90_as";
google_ad_type = "text";
google_ad_channel = "";
google_color_border = "000000";
google_color_bg = "000000";
google_color_link = "FFFF00";
google_color_text = "FFFFFF";
google_color_url = "FFFF00";
google_ui_features = "rc:0";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
<br /><br />

<h2>Landing Tel-Aviv straight to Hebron</h2>
<p>Its 18.1.2007 arround 5:00 am. We are getting to friends of mine flat. Just quickly throw away our luggage
and then directly to Central Bus station. 
</p>
<img src="/pics/israel/israel-picture-tel-aviv-idf-soldiers-3.jpg" width="600" height="399" alt="israel-picture-tel-aviv-idf-soldiers" border="0">
<br clear="all">
<p>For everyone who is first time in Israel. Just visit of central bus station is pretty shocking.
First of all they the security check is the same like on airport (you get use to very fast because
they check you in the same way even at the entrance of every restaurant or club). Secondly young
soldiers are everywhere. The israel is the only country which has military duty for man and woman as well. Boys has to serve 3 years, girls just 2. So you see them all around and to be honest
they do not lookl frustrated at all. :)<br /><br />
<img src="/pics/israel/israel-picture-west-bank-armoured-bus-0003.jpg" width="375" height="500" alt="israel-picture-west-bank-armoured-bus" align="left" border="0">
Our destination is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hebron">Hebron</a> located on west bank (under palestinian authority control) and the way 
will not be easy because there are no any lines there. It is pretty dangerous place and most of isrealis have 
never been there during their whole life. We are getting in armoured bus (bullet proof windows etc.) direction
the nearest settlement: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qiryat_Arba">Qiryat Arba</a>. Btw. We are the only non-uniformed passengers.</p><br clear="all">
<br /><br />
<p>There are no real bus stops in settlements so sometimes its pretty confusing to get off at 
the righ place. Anyway we decided to get out because friend of mine though it is the place.
So no we are in the middle of nowhere trying to find a place to hitchhike to Hebron. After
one hour we find out we are completly wrong. Qiryat Arba is next settlement around 4 kilometers away and
tt is danger to go there by foot so we have to hitchhike to Qiryat Arba first and then to Hebron.</p>
<img src="/pics/israel/israel-picture-hebron-qiryat-arba-0003.jpg" width="600" height="399" alt="qiryat-arba" border="0">
<br clear="all">
<p>After two hours we are in Hebron. Hebron is one of the most ancient cities in the Middle East. And one of the oldest continuously 
inhabited cities in the world as well. Population around 150000 palestinians and 500 jews 
(which are guarded by 5000 israel soldiers). Its is holy city because allmost all patriarchs 
are buried here (sara, isaac, rebekah, rachel), second holiest city for jews called the 
city "the City of the Patriarchs". We are staying right in front of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cave_of_the_Patriarchs">Cave of the Patriarchs</a>. 
Synague, thomb and mosque at once. Today some muslim festival take place there so there are a lot 
of policemans and atmosphere is pretty hot. </p>
<img src="/pics/israel/israel-picture-hebron-0005.jpg" width="600" height="399" alt="hebron cave of the patriarch" border="0">
<br clear="all">
<p>Very soon we are getting to know some settlers. They are really interested in what we are 
doing there because not very much visitors comming here in general. Look at picture bellow even 
ambulance has to be armoured here!</p>
<img src="/pics/israel/israel-picture-hebron-settler-0002.jpg" width="600" height="399" alt="hebron-settler" border="0">
<br clear="all">
<p>These guys are very nice to use and they offer to give us a tour guide. So we are walking around 
idf checkpoints. On every second corner there is a story who died here and when.
Wanna bit of frustration?</p>
<img src="/pics/israel/israel-picture-hebron-0003.jpg" width="600" height="399" alt="picture-hebron idf" border="0">
<br /><br />
<img src="/pics/israel/israel-picture-hebron-0004.jpg" alt="picture-hebron idf" width="600" height="399" border="0">
<br clear="all">
<p>We did not want to go too far from last checkpoint because it was quite obvious that there are some
problems all around (shooting can be heard clearly).</p>
<img src="/pics/israel/israel-picture-jerusalem-gaza-hebron-golan-0006.jpg" width="600" height="399" alt="hebron" border="0">
<br clear="all">
<p>When we get back to the cave it was around 6pm. and no car have been parking there anymore. 
So question was how to get back to Qiryat Arba. After 30 minutes some one give as a lift to the nearest 
bus station and on the we found out why everybody told us that comming back on foot to Quiryat Arba is
almost suicide. A lot of strange people were rubberneck on the streets and so on. 10:00pm we are safe
home in Tel Aviv Jaffo which is very nice by night:</p>
<img src="/pics/israel/israel-picture-tel-aviv2.jpg" width="600" height="399" alt="" border="0">
<br /><br />
<img src="/pics/israel/israel-picture-tel-aviv1.jpg" width="600" height="399" alt="" border="0">
<br clear="all"><br /><br />
<h2>Jerusalem, capital of all</h2>
<p>10:00 am we are on the way to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerusalem">Jerusalem</a>. No armoured bus anymore. Around noon time we get to the
ancient city and  we were walking around famous sights and our favoured places and restaurants. 
Lunch we spent in Praha restaurant eating fake hungarian goulash with dumplings (we got ordinary
goulash with potatos something instead however good taste after days of eating just falafel :) ).
Here are some pictures next day at night in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_of_the_Holy_Sepulchre">Church of the Holy Sepulchre</a>
 and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Wall">Kotel (western wall of second temple)</a>.</p>  

<img src="/pics/israel/israel-picture-jerusalem-holy-sepulchre-2.jpg" width="600" height="392" alt="jerusalem-holy-sepulchre" border="0">
<br /><br />
<img src="/pics/israel/israel-picture-jerusalem-holy-sepulchre-3.jpg" width="600" height="399" alt="jerusalem-holy-sepulchre" border="0">
<br /><br />
<img src="/pics/israel/israel-picture-jerusalem-kotel-0020.jpg" width="600" height="399" alt="jerusalem kotel" border="0">
<br clear="all">
<p>Now we are on the way to Afula to get to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kibutz">kibbutz</a> Ein Harod to visit my realtives. 
Kibutzs are collective community villages (cities). Its kind of ideology way of living: everybody 
share everything and no one owns anything. People working for kibbutz and gets everything 
they need (like house, food, goods). Most of kibbutzs are willage type of setlements around some
factory or farm which giving people jobs. They provide corporate dinning hall, swiming pool or
car renting (free for members). Around 8% of all israelis living in Kibbutz. Getting less now days
because for young people this way of living is not cool anymore. We were quite surprised by 
visiting nice club near by Ein Harod. On our way back we drive golf car (pretty drunk) which 
was very funny. :) 
</p>
<img src="/pics/israel/israel-kibutz-car-0003.jpg" width="600" height="450" alt="fun in kibbutz" border="0">
<br clear="all"><br /><br />
<h2>Golan Heights</h2>
<p>Next day we were going to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golan_heights">Golan Heights</a>. 
Israel captured land during Six Day War in 1967 and Yom Kippur War in 1973. Nice piece of 
nature full of mines and other war artefacts.</p>
<img src="/pics/israel/israel-picture-golan-heights-0012.jpg" width="600" height="399" alt="golan heights danger mines" border="0">
<br /><br />
<img src="/pics/israel/israel-picture-golan-heights-fortress-0011.jpg" width="600" height="399" alt="" border="0">
<br /><br />
<img src="/pics/israel/israel-picture-idf-centurion-tank-0012.jpg" width="600" height="399" alt="" border="0">
<br /><br />
<img src="/pics/israel/israel-picture-golan-heights-mosque-0011.jpg" width="600" height="399" alt="" border="0">
<br /><br />
<img src="/pics/israel/israel-picture-golan-heights-0011.jpg" width="600" height="399" alt="" border="0">
<br clear="all">
<p>Last picture is from Syrian border with anti-tank barrier. On our way back we went to 
Kineret lake and Nazareh. Then by bus back to Tel-Aviv.</p>
<h2>Gaza, Ber-sheba, Massada, Dead See and back</h2>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaza_strip">Gaza strip</a> is very small area with 
around 1.4 mil residents, mostly Palestinians. Probably most dangerous place in middle east. 
To be honest I do not know why we wanted to go there. Maybe just kind of adrenalin. 
Anyway we were able to get just to the border line. No way to get in. Gaza is surrounded by 
defence wall (security fence), 6 m high concrete wall. It takes exatly 1.5 minutes israeli army HMMWV (idf) 
to capture you when are waling near by this wall. They were quite angry to us however
at the end they were happy to see just stupid tourist and not something else. </p>
<img src="/pics/israel/israel-picture-gaza-idf-hummer-h1-HMMWV0005.jpg" width="600" height="399" alt="gaza-idf-hummer-h1-HMMWV" border="0">
<br /><br />
<img src="/pics/israel/israel-picture-gaza-idf-soldeir-0005.jpg" width="390" height="550" alt="gaza defence fence" border="0">
<br clear="all">
<p>Our next steps goes to the judea desert to visit <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massada">massada</a> 
and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_sea">dead sea</a>. Massada is really unique fortrest in 
the world. It was build on the top of flat mountain and it had everything you need to survive: 
rainy watter tank, fields. No wonder Romans spent few years at mountin foot and even after 
that they won just because all of defenders self-murdered.</p>
<img src="/pics/israel/israel-picture-masada-judea-desert-0016.jpg" width="399" height="600" alt="masada-judea-desert" border="0">
<br /><br />
<img src="/pics/israel/israel-picture-masada-judea-desert-0018.jpg" width="600" height="399" alt="masada-judea-desert" border="0">
<br clear="all">
<p>And this is the end of our journey... just map of travel.</p>
<img src="/pics/israel/israel-picture-map-001.jpg" width="600" height="604" alt="" border="0">
<br /><br /><br /><br />
<!-- AD -->
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-7035637283530791";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 90;
google_ad_format = "728x90_as";
google_ad_type = "text";
google_ad_channel = "";
google_color_border = "000000";
google_color_bg = "000000";
google_color_link = "FFFF00";
google_color_text = "FFFFFF";
google_color_url = "FFFF00";
google_ui_features = "rc:0";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>

<br />
Well... ???
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.howtoshot.com/25/pictures-from-israel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D300 vs D200! Which one is better?</title>
		<link>http://www.howtoshot.com/20/d200-vs-d300-nikon-d300-better-than-nikon-d200/</link>
		<comments>http://www.howtoshot.com/20/d200-vs-d300-nikon-d300-better-than-nikon-d200/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 11:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Camera arena]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtoshot.com/20/nikon-d300-better-than-nikon-d200/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nikon D300 vs D200 Just 3 days after anouncing brand new Canon D40 new Nikon horse arrive as well. Welcome Nikon D300 successor of the famous Nikon D200. Thats marketing we are not that much interested in. New model come old become to be a part of history. This is the best time to decide [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Nikon D300 vs D200</h1>
<p ALIGN="justify"> 
<img src="/pics/d300smallcrop.jpg" width="218" height="134" alt="Nikon D300" border="0" align="left">
Just 3 days after anouncing brand new Canon D40 new Nikon horse arrive as well. Welcome Nikon D300
successor of the famous Nikon D200. Thats marketing we are not that much interested in. New model
come old become to be a part of history. This is the best time to decide if the older model is 
good enough to buy or not since the price of the older one will go down very soon.</p>
<br /><span id="more-20"></span>
<p><br CLEAR="all" /></p>
<br />
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-7035637283530791";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 90;
google_ad_format = "728x90_as";
google_ad_type = "text_image";
google_ad_channel = "";
google_color_border = "000000";
google_color_bg = "000000";
google_color_link = "FFFF00";
google_color_text = "FFFFFF";
google_color_url = "FFFF00";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
<br /><br />

<h2>Why to buy Nikon D300 now?</h2>
<p>Maybe we wanna the best of the best and we want it now. However we should think about the older
version Nikon D200 because its price is going down and it could be enough for our needs. Lets have a look
on both and try to find difference. 
</p>
<h2>Nikon D300 Key Features</h2>
<p>These ones you can not find on Nikon D200...</p>
<ul TYPE="circle">
<li>12.3 megapixel CMOS senso (dx format -> crop 1.5x)</li>
<li>Self-cleaning sensor (vibration agains dust)</li>
<li>3.0" LCD monitor (0.9Mpx), can be used as viewfinder!</li>
<li>Really fast operation (powerup 13 ms, shutter lag 45 ms, blackout 100 ms)</li>
<li>Improved autofocus (AF): 51 points, tracking by color, auto-focus calibration up to 20 separate settings by lens</li>
<li>6 fps (frame per second - machine gun mode)</li>
<li>And more...</li>
</ul>

<p>There is much more I just tried to find the most important features which makes Nikon D300 
unique now and especially when we are going to comparte that to Nikon D200.</p>
<h2>Nikon D300 vs. D200 main differences</h2>
<p>Lets have a look on our difference sheet</p>

<table width="600" border="1" bordercolor="#ffffff">
<tr>
	<td></td>
	<td><font color="#00FF00">Nikon D300</font></td>	
	<td><font color="#00FF00">Nikon D200</td>
	<td>Nikon D80</td>
	<td>Nikon D40x</td>
	<td>Nikon D40</td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Sensor</strong><br />(Megapixels)</td>
	<td>12.3 Mpx CMOS</td>
	<td>10 Mpx CCD</td>
	<td>10 Mpx CCD</td>
	<td>10 Mpx CCD</td>
	<td>6 Mpx CCD</td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>exposure metering</strong></td>
	<td>1005 seg. RGB<br />(2. generation)</td>	
	<td>1005 seg. RGB<br />(2. generation)</td>
	<td>420 seg. RGB<br />(2. generation)</td>
	<td>420 seg. RGB<br />(2. generation)</td>
	<td>420 seg. RGB<br />(2. generation)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Shutter time</strong><br />max. time of shutter</td>
	<td>1/8000</td>	
	<td>1/8000</td>
	<td>1/4000</td>
	<td>1/4000</td>
	<td>1/4000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Continuous shooting</strong><br />machinegun mode (frames per second)</td>
	<td>6 fps, up to 8 fps<br />with grip</td>		
	<td>5 fps</td>	
	<td>3 fps</td>
	<td>3 fps</td>
	<td>2.6 fps</td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Flash X-sync</strong> max. time that can be used with flash</td>
	<td>1/250, up to 1/320<br />with reduced GN (flash power)</td>	
	<td>1/250</td>
	<td>1/200</td>
	<td>1/200</td>
	<td>1/200</td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Sensitivity - ISO</strong></td>
	<td>100-1600 (6400)</td>	
	<td>100-1600 (3200)</td>
	<td>100-1600 (3200)</td>
	<td>100-3200</td>
	<td>200-3200</td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>live view</strong>LCD as a viewfinder</td>
	<td>Y</td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Built-in flash power</strong><br />speedlight, GN ISO 200</td>
	<td>18</td>	
	<td>18</td>
	<td>18</td>
	<td>17</td>
	<td>17</td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Battery power</strong></td>
	<td>1500 mAh</td>	
	<td>1500 mAh</td>
	<td>1500 mAh</td>
	<td>1000 mAh</td>
	<td>1000 mAh</td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Storage type</strong></td>
	<td>CF (UDMA)</td>	
	<td>CF</td>
	<td>SD+SDHC</td>
	<td>SD+SDHC</td>
	<td>SD+SDHC</td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>AF lock / no. focus points</strong></td>
	<td>Y/51</td>	
	<td>Y/11</td>
	<td>Y/11</td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font>/3</td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font>/3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Command dials</strong></td>
	<td>2</td>	
	<td>2</td>
	<td>2</td>
	<td>1</td>
	<td>1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>AF mode control switch</strong></td>
	<td>Y</td>	
	<td>Y</td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Depth of field preview button</strong></td>
	<td>Y</td>	
	<td>Y</td>
	<td>Y</td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Remote cord connector</strong></td>
	<td>Y</td>
	<td>Y</td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Wireless Remote Control</strong></td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>	
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
	<td>Y</td>
	<td>Y</td>
	<td>Y</td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>2. status LCD</strong></td>
	<td>Y</td>	
	<td>Y</td>
	<td>Y</td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Buitt-in flash commander / no. chanels</strong></td>
	<td>Y/2</td>	
	<td>Y/2</td>
	<td>Y/2</td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><strong>Non AF-S lens compatibility</strong><br />Old lens full suport</td>
	<td>Y</td>	
	<td>Y</td>
	<td>Y</td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
	<td><font color="#DBDE00">N</font></td>
</tr>
</table><br /><br />
<img src="/pics/nikon-d200-vs-nikon-d300.jpg" width="694" height="250" alt="nikon-d200-vs-nikon-d300" border="0">
<br clear="all">
<div align="center">Nikon D200 vs Nikon D300: same size just 5g difference (D200)</div>
<br />
<h2>Nikon D300 vs. D200 main differences</h2>
<p>From average user pespective there are not many reasons to upgrade from Nikon D200 to D300. 
For pros (especially press and sport reporters) it could be faster shutter and better watterprofing 
(not everybody likes to handle bulky Nikon D2xs or D3). Everobody who works in studio enviroment 
enjoy 2 more megapixels. Better autofocus is good for everyone how ever most of people can stay with
"just 11 points". The only real feature is live view which most of people find out to be newbie 
option. I do not agree at all. There are many situations where this can help a lot. I remember 
few shots I have made in the past with compat camera and I can not make any more with my DSLR. 
</p>
<p>So nothing special for 500 USD dont you think? From Nikon D200 the only trouble is its battery
life: not everyone know that average D200 can shoot just 300 pictures on battery charge. My old 
D70 can do 700 more (yes, thats why most of the D200 users buying grip! :) ). Lets hope D300 can
do better job. I am pretty shure about.</p>
<h2>Result</h2>
<p>If you want to have latest thing go for Nikon D300. If value for money is the power for you take
Nikon D200 in sale (comming soon i think) or Nikon D80. In most cases you can not be disapointed by
them.</p><br /><br />
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-7035637283530791";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 90;
google_ad_format = "728x90_as";
google_ad_type = "text_image";
google_ad_channel = "";
google_color_border = "000000";
google_color_bg = "000000";
google_color_link = "FFFF00";
google_color_text = "FFFFFF";
google_color_url = "FFFF00";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script><br /><br />
<br />
Well... what do you think about new D300?
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.howtoshot.com/20/d200-vs-d300-nikon-d300-better-than-nikon-d200/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WordPress: select all and delete marked posts</title>
		<link>http://www.howtoshot.com/18/wordpress-delete-all-or-marked-posts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.howtoshot.com/18/wordpress-delete-all-or-marked-posts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 21:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtoshot.com/18/wordpress-delete-all-or-marked-posts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WordPress delete hack/plugin Its just few days I have started to use WordPress and I am not sure it is right system for me. There are few things I am really missing here like possibility to delete more than one post at once (sometimes delete all posts). I am not real bloger and maybe I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>WordPress delete hack/plugin</h1>
<p ALIGN="justify"><img SRC="/pics/WP2.2.2_delete_hack_small.jpg" WIDTH="227" HEIGHT="239" BORDER="0" />
Its just few days I have started to use WordPress and I am not sure it is
right system for me. There are few things I am really missing here like possibility to
delete more than one post at once (sometimes delete all posts).  I am not real bloger and maybe I need true CMS instead. Anyway... since I am too lazy to do relocate to other system and even one friend of mine having same problem I decided to make my first Worpress hack (or plugin how its cool to call hacks now :) ).
<span id="more-18"></span>
<br />
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-7035637283530791";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 90;
google_ad_format = "728x90_as";
google_ad_type = "text";
google_ad_channel = "";
google_color_border = "000000";
google_color_bg = "000000";
google_color_link = "FFFF00";
google_color_text = "FFFFFF";
google_color_url = "FFFF00";
google_ui_features = "rc:0";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
<br /><br />
<h2>Whats going on here? Select all and delete</h2>
Its simple. I have added one more button to manage post section. And also some check boxes ofcourse.
So when you wanna to delete more than one post simply check all you need and push the button.
<br CLEAR="all" />
<img SRC="/pics/WP2.2.2_delete_hack.jpg" WIDTH="490" HEIGHT="427" BORDER="0" />
<br CLEAR="all" />
<h2>Instalation</h2>
<ul TYPE="circle">
	<li>Backup everything you have online</li>
	<li>Replace <em>edit.php</em> and <em>post.php</em> files in <em>wp-admin</em> folder</li>
	<li>Enjoy deleting your posts</li>
</ul>
I am sorry guys I have no idea how to make real plugin for wordpress and I have no time to study that.
Function should be save. The only thing I had to bypass is delete confrimation process (I did not
want to confir every delete). I have made javascript confirmation dialog box instead.
<h2>Download</h2>
Here is the file you need: <a HREF="/pics/WP2.2.2-delete-marked-posts-hack.zip">WP-delete-marked-posts-hack.zip</a>.
Current version is WordPress 2.2.2.
<h2>Donation</h2>
Did you like my hack? If yes and you are so happy then you can help me with my hosting bill!

<a HREF="http://www.dreamhost.com/donate.cgi?id=8233"><img SRC="https://secure.newdream.net/donate4.gif" ALT="Donate towards my web hosting bill!" BORDER="0" /></a>

<br CLEAR="all" />
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-7035637283530791";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 90;
google_ad_format = "728x90_as";
google_ad_type = "text";
google_ad_channel = "";
google_color_border = "000000";
google_color_bg = "000000";
google_color_link = "FFFF00";
google_color_text = "FFFFFF";
google_color_url = "FFFF00";
google_ui_features = "rc:0";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
<br /><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.howtoshot.com/18/wordpress-delete-all-or-marked-posts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

